20+ year of experience
Insurance Defense Lawyers
Personal attention

New Mexico’s
Serious Injury Lawyers Find out if you have a case Find out if you have a case

Who’s At Fault In A Car Accident

28.07.25
Davis Kelin Law Firm

When vehicles collide on the roadway, determining who bears responsibility for the accident is a process that involves various legal principles and investigative procedures. The aftermath of a car accident can be overwhelming, with injured parties seeking compensation while insurance companies work to minimize their liability.

The process of establishing fault in a car accident case requires a thorough examination of multiple factors, including traffic laws, driver behavior, and road conditions at the time of the incident. This determination can significantly impact insurance claims, legal proceedings, and the compensation available to injured parties. The complexity of this process often necessitates the involvement of various professionals, from law enforcement officers to accident reconstruction specialists.

To establish negligence, several elements must be proven: the existence of a duty of care, breach of that duty, causation, and resulting damages. Drivers owe a duty of care to others on the road, and when they breach this duty through careless actions, they can be held legally responsible for any resulting injuries or damages.

Drivers have a duty of care to others on the road, which means they must exercise reasonable care to avoid causing harm to others. When a driver breaches this duty, they can be held liable for any resulting accidents or injuries.

The concept of negligence helps courts and insurance companies determine who should bear the financial responsibility for accidents and their consequences. Comparative negligence is a legal principle that allows multiple parties to share fault in an accident, with each party’s responsibility calculated as a percentage. This system recognizes that accidents often result from the actions of multiple parties and aims to distribute liability accordingly. In states following comparative negligence rules, injured parties can still recover damages even if they were partially at fault for the accident.

Contributory negligence, on the other hand, is a more stringent standard that prevents an injured party from recovering any damages if they contributed to the accident in any way. This approach is followed by only a few jurisdictions and can lead to harsh results for injured parties who bear even minimal responsibility for the accident.

The investigation process following a car accident involves collecting and analyzing various types of evidence to establish fault. This includes photographing the accident scene, documenting vehicle damage, obtaining police reports, and reviewing surveillance footage when available. Physical evidence at the scene, such as skid marks, debris patterns, and point of impact, can provide crucial insights into how the accident occurred.

Modern technology has expanded the scope of evidence available in car accident cases. Data from vehicle black boxes, dashcams, and traffic cameras can provide objective information about the circumstances leading to the accident. Cell phone records may be examined to determine if distracted driving played a role in the collision.

The thoroughness of the investigation often correlates directly with the strength of the case for determining fault.

Witness testimonies can provide valuable perspectives on how an accident occurred, often filling in gaps that physical evidence alone cannot address. Eyewitnesses can offer accounts of driver behavior, road conditions, and other relevant factors that contributed to the accident. Their statements can be particularly compelling when they have no personal stake in the outcome of the case.

Expert witnesses, such as accident reconstruction specialists, medical professionals, and traffic safety experts, can provide professional analysis and opinions that help establish fault. These experts use their specialized knowledge to interpret evidence, explain complex technical aspects, and provide credible testimony about the causes and consequences of the accident. Their input often proves key in cases where fault determination is particularly challenging or disputed.

State laws govern various aspects of the fault determination process, including the statute of limitations for filing claims, rules about evidence admissibility, and standards for proving fault. These laws can greatly influence the outcome of a case, making it necessary to be aware of the specific laws in the relevant jurisdiction.

Insurance companies play a significant role in the legal aspects of fault determination. They conduct their own investigations, negotiate settlements, and may dispute liability findings. This can lead to complex interactions between insurance companies and the legal system, requiring careful navigation to protect the rights of injured parties.

Professional legal representation can be invaluable in car accident cases, particularly when fault determination is contested or complex. Attorneys experienced in car accident cases understand the nuances of fault determination and can effectively advocate for their clients’ interests. They can handle communications with insurance companies, gather and preserve evidence, and ensure that all legal requirements are met.

Legal professionals can also help accident victims understand their rights and options while guiding them through the claims process. They can assess the strength of a case, identify potential challenges, and develop strategies to overcome them. With the complexity of fault determination in car accidents, having skilled legal representation often makes a significant difference in the outcome of the case.

Do you have a case?

Find out in 3 easy steps if you have a case.
All fields are required. If you need immediate assistance, do not hesitate to call us.

Note: Completing this form does not create an Attorney-Client Relationship
*information required